An "IT Insider" Approach to Correcting Profound Deficiencies
in IT Salary Surveys
Why IT Salary Surveys Have Big Problems...and How Foote Partners Fixed Them
Rapidly evolving information technology jobs are so unique in the universe of business
employment that using passive surveying methods to obtain compensation benchmark
data now yields extremely inaccurate results. Why? Because of the massive mismatch
problem that now exists between IT job titles and what these professionals actually do
on-the-job.
The "job title thing" is an epidemic widely acknowledged by HR compensation
professionals and IT salary surveyors alike. It affects more than half of all employed IT
workers by even the most conservative estimates. Making the situation worse is that the
most reputable HR consulting firms, including Towers Perrin, William M. Mercer,
Watson Wyatt, Hewitt, and Aon/Radford, refuse to offer a solution via their off-the-shelf
IT salary surveys: You must contract with them for expensive custom survey consulting.
The Foote Partners solution more than a decade ago was to create a new methodology---
dubbed "IT Insider"---that produced the first salary surveys in North America to define
and benchmark "new breed" IT positions and job families in Data Warehousing/Business
Intelligence, Unix, NT, Web/I-net, e-Commerce, and Business Technology (1994-1995)
and IT Security, SAP and other enterprise software applications (1997).
The IT Insider method corrects for job title/job content mismatches by reclassifying
surveyed participants according to what they do on-the-job and assigning to them the
most accurate job title before their pay data is loaded into our survey data compilation
engine. It is time-consuming, expensive, and requires a deep grounding in technology
and the nuances of IT professional employment.
Along with having that unique grounding, Foote Partners has unprecedented access to IT
workers at more than 1,980 research partner employers. Overall, their methodology
produces better data screening and cleaning, superior statistical reliability and validity,
and constantly refreshed and consistent ‘real world’ salary and tech skills pay data. No
other IT compensation survey research firm today publishes off-the-shelf surveys that use
IT job title alignment methods.
IT infrastructure positions form a strong foundation for this research, however Foote
Partners’ competitive distinction has long been its focus on those critical new strategic
and tactical positions often unreported (or under-reported) in other IT surveys. Findings
are updated continuously and published every three months, aided by our constant flow
of confidential IT compensation data from North American public and private sector
employer HR departments and IT, HR, and business executives research partners
Foote Partners relationships with their research partners---many of whom were clients,
colleagues, and associates of our senior research team of former McKinsey & Company,
Towers Perrin, Gartner and META Group consultants and analysts---have been forged
over many years. Foote has access not only to their IT compensation databases but also
to IT managers and workers to facilitate the matching of job content with comparable job
titles.
Foote Partners surveys IT compensation job-by-job, city-by-city: 130 positions, 82 cities
in the United State and Canada. There are no geographic multipliers used in our research,
no cost-of-living coefficients. Theirs is constantly refreshed ‘real world’ salary and skills
pay data.
What Does Foote Partners Do That Most Others Don't?
Several aspects of Foote Partners’ compensation data collection methodology sets them
apart from other IT salary survey firms.
- Foote Partners is the only firm in North America that corrects for job title/job content
mismatches for surveyed workers before the survey data enters the data compilation
phase. All their customers need to do is match their workers to Foote’s detailed, long
form job descriptions that are regularly updated to keep up with changing job
conditions.
- Foote Partners surveys the market values of more than 420 common IT skills and
certifications, and as with all of their surveys, update the results every three months.
So if you aren’t willing to re-title jobs to match actual content but you need to
differentiate workers within a broad job title (such as "programmer" or
"administrator"), you can use their skills survey data to adjust their base pay for the
presence of various IT skills and therefore benchmark their base pay to job titles they
should have.
- Foote Partners uses no aggregated data sources or compilation of other surveys,
instead collecting their data job-by-job, city-by-city, continuously throughout the
year. Findings are updated and published quarterly, aided by a constant flow of
confidential compensation data from public and private sector HR departments and
IT, HR, and business executive research partners. From Foote’s non-HR research
partners, they receive the same compensation data their HR departments possess,
typically delivered in electronic database, spreadsheet formats, or paper files. Foote’s
validation techniques involve active interviewing and interaction with IT
management and the rank-and-file workforce. Consultations with compensation
experts help us to pinpoint the most influential employers in every target city and
investigate local labor market and economic conditions that may be influencing
staffing and pay issues.
- Foote Partners track critical labor market fluctuations and have an insider's
knowledge of evolving technology. They keep a close watch on the movement of IT
jobs in lines of business that bring IT workers in continual contact with customers -
the so-call 'hybrid' IT jobs that now define the new breed of IT worker.
- Foote Partners’ uses an experienced team of former Gartner industry analysts,
McKinsey & Company. Towers Perrin, and Wm. M. Mercer consultants, and former
corporate HR, IT, and business executives, who have unprecedented access to more
than 93,000 IT workers. They work closely with nearly 2,000 research partners to
correct salary survey problems, which just begin with the job title/job content
discontinuities mentioned above. Overall, Foote’s innovative methods produce better
data screening and cleansing, superior statistical reliability and validity, and
constantly refreshed and consistent ‘real world’ salary and tech skills pay data.
IT Salary and Cash Bonus Pay
Foote Partners' Quarterly IT Skills & Certifications Pay Index and IT Salary+Skills Pay
Survey Reports are the popular choices for employers seeking to differentiate pay for
workers possessing various technical certifications or skills. The market values for 130
IT jobs and more than 420 IT skills and certifications are compiled and published every
three months, with data from North American employers
While infrastructure positions form a strong foundation for their research, Foote Partners’
competitive distinction has long been its focus on those critical new strategic and tactical
positions often unreported (or under-reported) in IT surveys published by other large
firms. Foote’s findings are updated and published every three months.
Research participant metrics
IT compensation data for Foote Partners 2010 research findings were collected from
1,980 public and private sector organizations representing more than 30 private sector
industries plus government and educational institutions. Approximately 93,000 IT
workers are included in our continuously updated surveys.
- 13% of participating organizations have $3 billion+ in sales/$15+ billion in total
assets
- 25% of participating organizations earn more than $1 billion in annual revenues or
more than $3 billion in total assets
- 44% of participating organizations have $500+ million in sales/$1+ billion in total
assets/$500+ million in premiums/$500+ million operating budget (government,
educational, not-for-profit)
- 56% of participating organizations fall in the SMB (small-to-medium sized business)
segment, generally defined as organization under $500 million in sales.
- [Public sector] 5% have operating budgets of $500 million or more, 4% with
operating budgets $100 million to less than $500 million
(nonprofit/government/educational sectors)
|
|